Remme Whitepaper


Nowadays, the main method of accessing various local and network resources is a
password, that has proven itself as a way of identifying and securing users and
resources. However, it has one serious drawback: in case of stealing a password,
an attacker gets access to all the data of the user who owned this password. In
addition, users usually have the same password for multiple services, the situation
gets even worse because these passwords can be weak or even be a subject for
vocabulary attack. Password databases from a variety of resources periodically fall
into open access. In general, even if the resource provides the ability to change
the password, this method is somewhat vulnerable, since the user’s mailboxes are
usually protected by a password, often the same as that used on other resources.
Thus, the password can not serve as a sufficient instrument for protecting user data
and guarantee the security of the user session.

An approach to this problem is password managers. This software, which provides
a secure storage for passwords, and, in the case of integration as a browser
extension, is able to withstand numerous ways of stealing passwords. Also,
password managers are often able to generate secure passwords that are unique
to each resource, which takes security to a new level. The obvious drawback of
such protection is that the storage is protected with a master password (Lastpass,
1Password), and in case of theft or brute force the master password, it all boils
down to the previous thesis.

Two-factor authentication provides a partial solution of password problems. For
two-factor authentication, in addition to the password, it is required to provide the
resource with some more data that should be available only to a particular user.
Examples of the second factor:
1) One-time passwords that are generated every n seconds are the most
common option. Usually implemented with TOTP protocol.
2) One-time passwords sent in the message. Usually, SMS or instant
messengers is used.
3) Hardware tokens.

Another way of authorizing a user into the system is SSL/TLS certificates, which are
widely adopted in enterprise solutions, such as banking, tax services, etc.
A system of Public Key Infrastructure supports the creation, distribution and
identification of public encryption keys, enabling users and systems to both
securely exchange data over untrusted environment such as the Internet as well as
verify the identity of the other party of conversation. PKI provides possibilities for
digital signature (confirmation of authentication, non-repudiation and message
integrity), data encryption (confidentiality during data storing, transfer and
processing) and authorization in one complex system.

The core of PKI – the public key encryption systems (a private key for encryption, a
public key for decryption) based on strong mathematical approaches. But simple
presence of public/private key is not enough for trust. There should be a complex
and comprehensive system with all functions listed above.

Typically PKI consists of a lot of controls beginning from policies and standards
through administration and management to software and hardware. PKI can be
realized in different architectures: simple, network, hierarchy etc. But we should
understand that the heart of PKI is digital certificates. A digital certificate is a
document designed to affirm the identity (user, system etc.) of the certificate
subject and bind that identity to the public key contained in the certificate.

The typical scheme of PKI includes next elements:
• Certification Authority (CA) – a trusted party provides services for issue
digital certificates.
• Registration Authority (RA) – a trusted party responsible for accepting
requests for digital certificates and authenticating the entity making the
request. Sometimes RA also called subordinate CA.
• Validation Authority (VA) – a trusted party provides a service used to verify
the validity of a digital certificate. It’s clear that different VA should has
database of valid certificates, revoked certificates and communication with
different CA.

As we can see, functioning of PKI based on trusted authorities with different

From our point of view we should focus on several core issues. First of all, PKI now
is government regulated or business driven ecosystem depends on a sector of
application. Government CA and PKI at all usually are not acceptable for wide
public or SMB use according to different limitations and application lockin. For
example, specific CA works with specific tax reporting software. Services of
business CA very often expensive and there is a collusion between software
vendors and CA for including specific CA into a list of trusted for this software. For
example, web browsers don’t accept all certificates issued by different CA.
Sometimes ago it was a brilliant vision named “web of trust” were most of noted
problems could be resolved with teamwork of count of CA/VA/RA. Unfortunately,
it left just as vision according to the disagreement s CA to work in a single network
of trust.

Our team works on solving those problems by implementing decentralized
public key infrastructure based on blockchain technology. The chosen
approach will give our end customers the way of managing their PKI with a high
level of security and all advantages of decentralized and distributed system,
including fault tolerance.

Advantages of REMME:
1. There is no centralized database of certificates and keys that could be
2. There are no technology lockin and API limitations. Easy integration with
existing systems.
3. There are no additional fees for different certificates/credentials in
different CA.
4. There are no possibilities for collusion between software/hardware
vendors and limited count of CAs.
5. Fast and protected public key distribution process.
6. Fast and protected certificate revocation process.
7. Single point of trust for different systems: easy single-sign-on
implementation, decentralized worldwide available authorization.
8. There are no legal limitations and government cooperation issues.
Additional advantages:
1. Acceptable for different types multi-factor authentication.
2. Full anonymity.
3. It allows to track all issued certificates, provides complete and
transparent control.

REMME is bringing blockchain to PKI infrastructure providing immutability of
data stored there.

For simple user it could look complicated, but all is simple: you don’t need to
remember count of login and passwords, you don’t need to pay five or ten
authorities for certificates used in tax, legal, bank, technical or other types of
software, you don’t need to control the live time of each password/certificate/key.

Remme Website
Remme Whitepaper